Lolita free essay sample

# 8211 ; Vladimir Nabokov. A Study Of The Main Character, Humbert Humbert, And How The Author Presen Essay, Research Paper ? Lolita? is an impressive and complex novel that allows its writer, Vladimir Nabokov, to make a credible and realistic cardinal character in the form of Humbert Humbert. He appears to present Humbert as cruel and evil adult male, yet, about touching. An bewitching figure that begs for the reader? s understanding. Nabokov skillfully manipulates the reader into experiencing understanding for both Humbert and the object of his fondnesss? Lolita. This is so an unbelievable undertaking for the writer to accomplish in such an intense and controversial state of affairs, yet he succeeds with his splendidly written prose, having fashionable, intricate literary effects displayed throughout the novel, giving an first-class penetration into a adult male? s life and his compulsions. ? Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, exhibit figure one is what the seraphs, the misinformed, simple, noble-winged seraphs, envied. Look at this tangle of forms. ? ? Lolita? is an history, narrated by Humbert Humbert, of his? tangle of irritants? . His relationship with Dolores Haze? Lolita? and his solitariness and conflicting emotions. It is written in prison by Humbert, a middle-aged European mind and deviant. He had spent many old ages in assorted sanatariums and suffers from an compulsion for immature misss. Young misss on the border of pubescence, nine to fourteen-year-old? nymphets? . Unfortunately for him, pedophilia is perchance the most socially unacceptable compulsion of all, and unlike with Dante? s Beatrice and Petrarch? s Laureen, who Humbert references, the 20th century denies him the merely female thing he truly desires. He discovers a fulfillment to his desires in the form of twelve-year-old Lolita, the kernel of a nymphet, in a little New England town. She is the girl of his landlady, and he becomes wholly fixated. The compulsion grows to an extent that he marries Lolita? s widowed mother Charl otte in a command to stay close to the object of his passion. He has no feelings for Charlotte at all, and when she quickly suggests that the kid be sent off so the two? lovers? can be entirely, Humbert instantly begins to see the possibility of slaying. Fate, nevertheless, intervenes, and she is killed in a freak accident after detecting his compulsion with her girl and running out into the center of a route. With his small stepdaughter he spends two old ages rolling the United States by auto. This biennial love matter necessarily ends in enduring, as Lolita elopes with another middle-aged adult male, Clare Quilty, go forthing Humbert to fall into insanity. Despite his efforts to track them he neer succeeds and bouncinesss in and out of more sanatariums until Lolita, now Dolly, contacts him for money, married, pregnant and no longer a nymphet. This triggers him to successfully transport out the slaying of his Nemesis, Quilty, and the novel ends about tragically with both Lolita and Humbert? s prematurely demises. She in childbearing and he of a bosom onslaught while expecting test in prison. The novel is written in the first individual narration, which creates a realistic feeling of him. You are introduced to him and his childhood at the beginning, and it is clear that his compulsion with Lolita started with his childhood sweetie. Her name was Annabel, and she died of typhus aged 13. ? Lolita began with Annabel? . He? broke her enchantment by incarnating her in another? . Nabokov had to include this account ; otherwise the reader would be left with the intuition whether something had happened in early age to do Humbert so troubled. This raises inquiry such as had Annabel non existed, would Humbert still have the attractive force for small misss? He is haunted by memories of his lost stripling love. Lolita was a? fatal effect of that? princedom by the sea? in my anguished yesteryear? . When he firsts lays eyes on Lolita, he compares her to Annabel? ? ..and she smelt about precisely like the other one, the Riviera one.. ? As the novel progresses though, these comparings ar e fleetly dropped, as he becomes wholly immersed in the 1 and merely thought of Lolita. Humbert is obsessed with Lolita. There is no other account. There is amazing grounds that he is genuinely haunted and clearly illustrated with his actions and behavior. He displays obsessional inclinations through is descriptive word pick and his commanding personality. Compulsion is the demand for entire control, and Humbert is highly commanding. He even controls the read Er. He tries to command the reader? s ideas about his narrative and manner their sentiments by speaking straight to the reader and trying to acquire them on his side? ? Humbert Humbert tried difficult to be good. Truly and genuinely, he did. ? He controls his healers every bit good? ? I discovered there was an eternal beginning of robust enjoyment in piddling with head-shrinkers: cutely taking them on ; neer allowing them see that you know all the fast ones of the trade ; contriving for them elaborate dreams.. ? He uses affectional words and images when he describes people in the novel and his linguistic communication conveys his compulsion for nymphets. This is shown in the manner he ever talks about the organic structure parts and vesture of nymphets, apparently he does non believe of Lolita as a homo at all, but instead as simply an object. ? My brass knuckss lay against the kid? s bluish denims. She was bare-footed ; her toenails showed leftovers of reddish Polish and there was a spot of adhesive tape across her large toe. ? Throughout? Lolita? , Humbert rationalizes his compulsion to the reader. The reader might do the error of believing that Humbert is ill, that he does non cognize that his actions are incorrect. This is precisely Humbert? s program. He wants to command the reader into sympathizing with him. However, his efforts to win fail because it is obvious that he is enduring from compulsion? simply in what he talks approximately and how he says it. There are highly few cases in the novel where Humbert is non speaking about Lolita or fantasying about holding complete control over nymphets. Evidence of the compulsion comes to an extreme when he earnestly considers killing Lolita? s? phocine? female parent for the exclusive intent of being following to her. To earnestly believe of killing person truly shows his finding. While sing him offense he said that people were? ..just near adequate to witness an accident and merely far plenty non to detect a crime.. ? Nabokov uses direct informal linguistic communication to make a realistic character with Humbert when he says? But what vitamin D? ye know, folks? I merely could non do myself make it! ? Aspects of Humbert? s personality and grounds of the Nabokov? s unique trade at making a credible character is the cagey linguistic communication used in depicting certain simple scenes. ? The stars that sparkled, and the autos that parkled? ? and when depicting Lolita herself? ? ..my dolourous and brumous darling.. ? This playing with words accents Humbert? s pensive personality. The text contains contradictions as good. He wants to? frantically possess? Lolita and yet he says that? with the most ardent force and foresight? he intended to? protect the pureness of that twelve twelvemonth old girl. ? . Peoples had? undermined the gradualness of his nature. ? By possessing her all his problems would be expelled? ..and I would be a healthy adult male. ? Nabokov has besides made usage of temper to underscore Humbert? s psychotic beliefs and compulsion. Again, this besides presents his chief character as credible. ? Lolita? is an highly witty book. By wishing immature misss, ? You have to be an creative person and a madman. ? Statements such as? Sundaes cause acne. ? ? Nymphets do non hold acne although they gorge themselves on rich nutrient, ? and, ? ..nymphets do non happen in polar regions. ? This effectual usage of temper shows how deluded and blatantly insane Humbert is, for his claims are frequently pathetic. It shows that he is lying to himself to do his scruples feel better for who and what he is ; a deviant. Humbert Humbert is an obsessional, disillusioned, striking and cryptic chief character to Vladmir Nabokov? s? Lolita? . One chief point must non be forgotten when he says? I knew I had fallen in love with Lolita everlastingly ; but I besides knew she would non be everlastingly Lolita. ? He was to the full cognizant of the state of affairs he was acquiring into, yet made up alibis for himself. He is full of contradictions, a awful, evil wretch of a adult male who somehow manages to derive the reader? s understanding. This is due to Nabokov? s fantastic skilled authorship and his endowment at making a supremely realistic cardinal character. His cagey mix of temper and play, and beautiful descriptions give a really elaborate penetration into the psychological workings of a adult male who is easy but clearly traveling insane. The modern-day subject ensures that the reader? s full attending is ever present. ? Lolita? manages to be both blisteringly amusing and painful, dark, distorted and corrupt, yet a beautiful love narrative with two tragically similar psyches. It is an luxuriant and obsessional work of art. jilted333 @ hotmail.com